Windsurf vs Cursor 2026: Which AI Code Editor Wins?
Windsurf vs Cursor compared on agentic coding, autocomplete, pricing, and developer experience. Find the best AI code editor.
Windsurf
★ 4.2AI code editor with agentic Cascade assistant.
Key Features
- ✓ Cascade agentic AI assistant
- ✓ Multi-file editing and refactoring
- ✓ Codebase-wide context understanding
- ✓ Tab autocomplete
- ✓ Terminal command generation
Cursor
★ 4.6AI-first code editor with deep codebase understanding.
Key Features
- ✓ Full codebase indexing and context
- ✓ Multi-file agentic editing
- ✓ Composer mode for complex changes
- ✓ Tab completion with diff preview
- ✓ Built on VS Code (familiar UX)
Use Case Breakdown
Agentic Multi-File Editing
Winner: CursorCursor's Composer and agent mode are more reliable for complex, multi-file tasks. Windsurf's Cascade is good but less consistent.
Autocomplete
Winner: tieBoth offer fast, accurate inline completions. Windsurf's Supercomplete predicts next actions; Cursor shows diff previews.
Codebase Understanding
Winner: CursorCursor's indexing and retrieval across large codebases is more mature and accurate.
Price
Winner: WindsurfWindsurf Pro at $15/mo vs Cursor Pro at $20/mo. Windsurf also has a more generous free tier.
Free Tier
Winner: WindsurfWindsurf offers unlimited autocomplete for free. Cursor limits free completions to 2,000.
Extension Compatibility
Winner: tieBoth are VS Code forks with strong extension compatibility.
Windsurf vs Cursor: The Complete Comparison
This is the closest head-to-head in AI coding tools. Both are VS Code forks with agentic AI capabilities. Cursor is more established; Windsurf is the scrappy challenger with better pricing.
The quick take
Choose Cursor if you want the most capable agentic coding experience and are willing to pay a premium. Choose Windsurf if you want 80% of Cursor’s capability at 75% of the price, with a better free tier.